OraFAQ Forum: Performance Tuning

Home » RDBMS Server » Performance Tuning
Show: Today's Messages :: Unanswered Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Please read the OraFAQ Forum Guide before posting.

Please contribute good answers to the wiki.

		Distinct versus group by By: trupti111 on Thu, 11 September 2008 07:36
		Re: Distinct versus group by By: trupti111 on Thu, 11 September 2008 07:37
		Re: Distinct versus group by By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 11 September 2008 07:53
		Re: Distinct versus group by By: trupti111 on Fri, 12 September 2008 00:45
		Re: Distinct versus group by By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 12 September 2008 01:15

		Gather statistics By: Olivia on Thu, 11 September 2008 06:10
		Re: Gather statistics By: Mahesh Rajendran on Thu, 11 September 2008 06:56

		Performance impact Kernel Parameters By: vikramjogi on Mon, 08 September 2008 14:01
		Re: Performance impact Kernel Parameters By: Mahesh Rajendran on Mon, 08 September 2008 14:52
		Re: Performance impact Kernel Parameters By: vikramjogi on Mon, 08 September 2008 16:25
		Re: Performance impact Kernel Parameters By: BlackSwan on Mon, 08 September 2008 16:32
		Re: Performance impact Kernel Parameters By: vikramjogi on Mon, 08 September 2008 16:46
		Re: Performance impact Kernel Parameters By: BlackSwan on Mon, 08 September 2008 16:54
		Re: Performance impact Kernel Parameters By: coleing on Wed, 10 September 2008 13:56

		use of index in performance tuning By: agrawal.prachi@gmail.com on Wed, 10 September 2008 10:21
		Re: use of index in performance tuning By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 10 September 2008 10:40
		Re: use of index in performance tuning By: harrysmall3 on Wed, 10 September 2008 10:49

		how to unpin a table from cache By: ArvindBhope on Wed, 10 September 2008 10:13
		Re: how to unpin a table from cache By: Mahesh Rajendran on Wed, 10 September 2008 10:21
		Re: how to unpin a table from cache By: ArvindBhope on Wed, 10 September 2008 10:26
		Re: how to unpin a table from cache By: BlackSwan on Wed, 10 September 2008 10:34

		A performance test of Oracle Analtyicals vs Group By By: harrysmall3 on Mon, 08 September 2008 11:17
		Re: A performance test of Oracle Analtyicals vs Group By By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 08 September 2008 12:27
		Re: A performance test of Oracle Analtyicals vs Group By By: harrysmall3 on Mon, 08 September 2008 12:33
		Re: A performance test of Oracle Analtyicals vs Group By By: Olivia on Tue, 09 September 2008 02:21
		Re: A performance test of Oracle Analtyicals vs Group By By: harrysmall3 on Tue, 09 September 2008 12:01
		Re: A performance test of Oracle Analtyicals vs Group By By: Olivia on Wed, 10 September 2008 02:25
		Re: A performance test of Oracle Analtyicals vs Group By By: harrysmall3 on Wed, 10 September 2008 10:05

		Cursor versus select into for simple select By: goo321 on Sun, 07 September 2008 12:00
		Re: Cursor versus select into for simple select By: rleishman on Sun, 07 September 2008 21:32
		Re: Cursor versus select into for simple select By: BlackSwan on Sun, 07 September 2008 22:14
		Re: Cursor versus select into for simple select By: harrysmall3 on Mon, 08 September 2008 14:37
		Re: Cursor versus select into for simple select By: goo321 on Tue, 09 September 2008 10:45

		Before Asking the Index Question By: harrysmall3 on Sun, 07 September 2008 20:01
		Re: Before Asking the Index Question By: Olivia on Mon, 08 September 2008 03:24
		Re: Before Asking the Index Question By: Olivia on Mon, 08 September 2008 04:07
		Re: Before Asking the Index Question By: harrysmall3 on Mon, 08 September 2008 10:22
		Re: Before Asking the Index Question By: Olivia on Tue, 09 September 2008 02:35
		Re: Before Asking the Index Question By: harrysmall3 on Tue, 09 September 2008 10:40

		Perfomance tuning of a view By: anantha on Tue, 09 September 2008 06:07
		Re: Perfomance tuning of a view By: michael_bialik on Tue, 09 September 2008 06:16
		Re: Perfomance tuning of a view By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 09 September 2008 07:19
		Re: Perfomance tuning of a view By: Olivia on Tue, 09 September 2008 09:09

		to find out time taken By: trupti111 on Tue, 02 September 2008 01:22
		Re: to find out time taken By: dwarak.k on Tue, 02 September 2008 02:08
		Re: to find out time taken By: macdba on Tue, 02 September 2008 13:56
		Re: to find out time taken By: Kevin Meade on Tue, 02 September 2008 20:17
		Re: to find out time taken By: trupti111 on Fri, 05 September 2008 02:51
		Re: to find out time taken By: trupti111 on Fri, 05 September 2008 02:54
		Re: to find out time taken By: dwarak.k on Fri, 05 September 2008 04:05
		Re: to find out time taken By: trupti111 on Fri, 05 September 2008 04:10
		Re: to find out time taken By: dwarak.k on Mon, 08 September 2008 02:28
		Re: to find out time taken By: trupti111 on Mon, 08 September 2008 06:03
		Re: to find out time taken By: dwarak.k on Mon, 08 September 2008 10:49
		Re: to find out time taken By: trupti111 on Tue, 09 September 2008 00:49
		Re: to find out time taken By: Kevin Meade on Fri, 05 September 2008 09:01
		Re: to find out time taken By: tanyaa on Tue, 09 September 2008 03:31

		Tuning of delete stmt By: srihari.gurram on Mon, 01 September 2008 01:10
		Re: Tuning of delete stmt By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 01 September 2008 01:44
		Re: Tuning of delete stmt By: michael_bialik on Tue, 02 September 2008 02:45
		Re: Tuning of delete stmt By: srihari.gurram on Tue, 02 September 2008 04:30
		Re: Tuning of delete stmt By: michael_bialik on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:43
		Re: Tuning of delete stmt By: Kevin Meade on Tue, 02 September 2008 20:29
		Re: Tuning of delete stmt By: si_buh on Fri, 05 September 2008 12:27
		Re: Tuning of delete stmt By: BlackSwan on Fri, 05 September 2008 12:32
		Re: Tuning of delete stmt By: harrysmall3 on Mon, 08 September 2008 19:34
		Re: Tuning of delete stmt By: harrysmall3 on Mon, 08 September 2008 19:36

		Use of Index By: me_arindam on Wed, 03 September 2008 02:03
		Re: Use of Index By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 03 September 2008 02:09
		Re: Use of Index By: JRowbottom on Wed, 03 September 2008 05:32
		Re: Use of Index By: me_arindam on Wed, 03 September 2008 09:38
		Re: Use of Index By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:11
		Re: Use of Index By: macdba on Thu, 04 September 2008 10:07
		Re: Use of Index By: me_arindam on Fri, 05 September 2008 04:10
		Re: Use of Index By: macdba on Wed, 03 September 2008 09:33
		Re: Use of Index By: BlackSwan on Wed, 03 September 2008 09:44
		Re: Use of Index By: harrysmall3 on Mon, 08 September 2008 14:58

		Why showing BITMAP in Plan while no bitmap exists for the table By: Olivia on Fri, 05 September 2008 06:37
		Re: Why showing BITMAP in Plan while no bitmap exists for the table By: Mahesh Rajendran on Fri, 05 September 2008 07:22
		Re: Why showing BITMAP in Plan while no bitmap exists for the table By: Olivia on Fri, 05 September 2008 07:40
		Re: Why showing BITMAP in Plan while no bitmap exists for the table By: Mahesh Rajendran on Fri, 05 September 2008 08:04
		Re: Why showing BITMAP in Plan while no bitmap exists for the table By: Olivia on Fri, 05 September 2008 08:22
		Re: Why showing BITMAP in Plan while no bitmap exists for the table By: Mahesh Rajendran on Fri, 05 September 2008 09:15
		Re: Why showing BITMAP in Plan while no bitmap exists for the table By: rleishman on Sun, 07 September 2008 21:36
		Re: Why showing BITMAP in Plan while no bitmap exists for the table By: harrysmall3 on Mon, 08 September 2008 13:13
		Re: Why showing BITMAP in Plan while no bitmap exists for the table By: Mahesh Rajendran on Fri, 05 September 2008 08:06

		lobg running query By: varunvir on Tue, 26 August 2008 12:51
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Tue, 26 August 2008 12:55
		Re: lobg running query By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 26 August 2008 13:11
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Tue, 26 August 2008 14:33
		Re: lobg running query By: BlackSwan on Tue, 26 August 2008 14:41
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Tue, 26 August 2008 15:40
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Tue, 26 August 2008 18:42
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Tue, 26 August 2008 22:05
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Tue, 26 August 2008 23:49
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Wed, 27 August 2008 00:41
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Wed, 27 August 2008 00:46
		Re: lobg running query By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 27 August 2008 00:55
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 27 August 2008 07:39
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Wed, 27 August 2008 09:35
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 27 August 2008 10:05
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Wed, 27 August 2008 10:26
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 27 August 2008 12:37
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:02
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Wed, 27 August 2008 15:06
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:09
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:31
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:34
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:36
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 28 August 2008 13:28
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 15:19
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 15:46
		Re: lobg running query By: BlackSwan on Thu, 28 August 2008 15:31
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 16:01
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 16:03
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 16:06
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 16:11
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 28 August 2008 16:34
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 16:56
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 28 August 2008 17:00
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 28 August 2008 18:06
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Wed, 03 September 2008 21:55
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 04 September 2008 08:27
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Thu, 04 September 2008 12:42
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 04 September 2008 13:49
		Re: lobg running query By: varunvir on Fri, 05 September 2008 14:47
		Re: lobg running query By: Kevin Meade on Fri, 05 September 2008 14:48

		help in tuning procedure By: trupti111 on Thu, 28 August 2008 07:29
		Re: help in tuning procedure By: BlackSwan on Thu, 28 August 2008 09:03
		Re: help in tuning procedure By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 28 August 2008 10:45
		Re: help in tuning procedure By: trupti111 on Fri, 29 August 2008 00:55
		Re: help in tuning procedure By: BlackSwan on Fri, 29 August 2008 00:59
		Re: help in tuning procedure By: trupti111 on Fri, 29 August 2008 01:03
		Re: help in tuning procedure By: michael_bialik on Fri, 29 August 2008 07:29
		Re: help in tuning procedure By: trupti111 on Fri, 05 September 2008 03:19

		to determine join order for tuning By: trupti111 on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:21
		Re: to determine join order for tuning By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:24
		Re: to determine join order for tuning By: trupti111 on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:55
		Re: to determine join order for tuning By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:04
		Re: to determine join order for tuning By: JRowbottom on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:32
		Re: to determine join order for tuning By: trupti111 on Fri, 05 September 2008 02:16

		tunning By: saagar on Thu, 04 September 2008 04:45
		Re: tunning By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 04 September 2008 04:57
		Re: tunning By: saagar on Thu, 04 September 2008 06:03
		Re: tunning By: dwarak.k on Thu, 04 September 2008 06:24
		Re: tunning By: S.Rajaram on Thu, 04 September 2008 06:25
		Re: tunning By: saagar on Thu, 04 September 2008 06:35
		Re: tunning By: rleishman on Thu, 04 September 2008 06:41
		Re: tunning By: saagar on Thu, 04 September 2008 07:30
		Re: tunning By: rleishman on Thu, 04 September 2008 22:30
		Re: tunning By: saagar on Thu, 04 September 2008 23:46

		Query to check that statistics gathered By: Olivia on Thu, 04 September 2008 04:29
		Re: Why different plan By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 04 September 2008 04:57
		Re: Query to check that statistics gathered By: JRowbottom on Thu, 04 September 2008 07:32
		Re: Query to check that statistics gathered By: Olivia on Thu, 04 September 2008 07:33
		Re: Query to check that statistics gathered By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 04 September 2008 08:54
		Re: Query to check that statistics gathered By: Olivia on Thu, 04 September 2008 10:20
		Re: Query to check that statistics gathered By: dwarak.k on Thu, 04 September 2008 09:38

		What does it signifies By: Olivia on Thu, 04 September 2008 07:31
		Re: What does it signifies By: JRowbottom on Thu, 04 September 2008 07:34

		Function Based Join Without Nested Loops By: annagel on Wed, 03 September 2008 08:55
		Re: Function Based Join Without Nested Loops By: JRowbottom on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:20
		Re: Function Based Join Without Nested Loops By: annagel on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:25
		Re: Function Based Join Without Nested Loops By: JRowbottom on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:41
		Re: Function Based Join Without Nested Loops By: annagel on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:51
		Re: Function Based Join Without Nested Loops By: rleishman on Wed, 03 September 2008 22:07
		Re: Function Based Join Without Nested Loops By: annagel on Thu, 04 September 2008 06:42

		Index not being used for Min/Max By: GreekBoy on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:22
		Re: Index not being used for Min/Max By: BlackSwan on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:28
		Re: Index not being used for Min/Max By: Mahesh Rajendran on Wed, 03 September 2008 10:34
		Re: Index not being used for Min/Max By: rleishman on Wed, 03 September 2008 22:13
		Re: Index not being used for Min/Max By: Olivia on Thu, 04 September 2008 01:45

		Which one is to choose? By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 08:14
		Re: Which one is to choose? By: BlackSwan on Tue, 02 September 2008 08:36
		Re: Which one is to choose? By: rleishman on Wed, 03 September 2008 22:36
		Re: Which one is to choose? By: Olivia on Thu, 04 September 2008 01:32

		alternative for DISTINCT By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 08:30
		Re: alternative for DISTINCT By: pablolee on Tue, 02 September 2008 08:31
		Re: alternative for DISTINCT By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 08:38
		Re: alternative for DISTINCT By: ehegagoka on Tue, 02 September 2008 08:51
		Re: alternative for DISTINCT By: BlackSwan on Tue, 02 September 2008 08:32
		Re: alternative for DISTINCT By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 09:22
		Re: alternative for DISTINCT By: pablolee on Tue, 02 September 2008 15:07
		Re: alternative for DISTINCT By: rleishman on Wed, 03 September 2008 22:25

		Not Exists Vs Join By: neha_garg123 on Tue, 02 September 2008 09:11
		Re: Not Exists Vs Join By: BlackSwan on Tue, 02 September 2008 09:13
		Re: Not Exists Vs Join By: neha_garg123 on Tue, 02 September 2008 09:20
		Re: Not Exists Vs Join By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 09:56
		Re: Not Exists Vs Join By: neha_garg123 on Tue, 02 September 2008 10:23
		Re: Not Exists Vs Join By: JRowbottom on Wed, 03 September 2008 06:11

		Performance tuning By: NewLife on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:11
		Re: Performance tuning By: varu123 on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:24
		Re: Performance tuning By: JRowbottom on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:26
		Re: Performance tuning By: NewLife on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:30
		Re: Performance tuning By: flyboy on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:33
		Re: Performance tuning By: Frank on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:48
		Re: Performance tuning By: S.Rajaram on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:52
		Re: Performance tuning By: NewLife on Tue, 02 September 2008 08:28
		Re: Performance tuning By: JRowbottom on Tue, 02 September 2008 09:17
		Re: Performance tuning By: NewLife on Tue, 02 September 2008 09:24

		UPDATE ISSUE By: someswar1 on Tue, 02 September 2008 04:54
		Re: UPDATE ISSUE By: JRowbottom on Tue, 02 September 2008 05:03
		Re: UPDATE ISSUE By: someswar1 on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:28
		Re: UPDATE ISSUE By: JRowbottom on Tue, 02 September 2008 08:11
		Re: UPDATE ISSUE By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:42

		Alternative way to avoid full scan? By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:22
		Re: Alternative way to avoid full scan? By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:33
		Re: Alternative way to avoid full scan? By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:42
		Re: Alternative way to avoid full scan? By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:43
		Re: Alternative way to avoid full scan? By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:50
		Re: Alternative way to avoid full scan? By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:55
		Re: Alternative way to avoid full scan? By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:08
		Re: Alternative way to avoid full scan? By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:17
		Re: Alternative way to avoid full scan? By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 07:35

		Query to check statistics are up to date By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:31
		Re: Query to check statistics are up to date By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:52
		Re: Query to check statistics are up to date By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 06:56

		How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 04:16
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: ThomasG on Mon, 01 September 2008 04:21
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 04:29
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: ThomasG on Mon, 01 September 2008 04:40
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 04:58
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: ThomasG on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:02
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:09
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: ThomasG on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:15
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:27
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: ThomasG on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:36
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: JRowbottom on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:36
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:36
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: ThomasG on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:38
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:45
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: ThomasG on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:50
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:50
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: ThomasG on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:54
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:59
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: JRowbottom on Mon, 01 September 2008 06:05
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 06:32
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: JRowbottom on Mon, 01 September 2008 07:15
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 06:40
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 07:17
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: JRowbottom on Mon, 01 September 2008 08:07
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Mon, 01 September 2008 08:25
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: JRowbottom on Mon, 01 September 2008 09:48
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: durgadas.menon on Mon, 01 September 2008 12:33
		Re: How to make the response time less for this query By: Olivia on Tue, 02 September 2008 02:08

		Table Partitioning By: mariaandreou on Tue, 26 August 2008 08:52
		Re: Table Partitioning By: rleishman on Sun, 31 August 2008 22:50
		Re: Table Partitioning By: mariaandreou on Mon, 01 September 2008 01:19
		Re: Table Partitioning By: rleishman on Mon, 01 September 2008 23:03
		Re: Table Partitioning By: mariaandreou on Tue, 02 September 2008 00:49

		Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: bmikle on Fri, 29 August 2008 01:58
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 29 August 2008 02:05
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: bmikle on Fri, 29 August 2008 02:20
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: JRowbottom on Fri, 29 August 2008 04:45
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: JRowbottom on Fri, 29 August 2008 06:20
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: bmikle on Fri, 29 August 2008 07:04
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: JRowbottom on Fri, 29 August 2008 07:12
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: JRowbottom on Fri, 29 August 2008 07:28
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: bmikle on Mon, 01 September 2008 04:19
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: JRowbottom on Mon, 01 September 2008 05:31
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: bmikle on Mon, 01 September 2008 08:12
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: S.Rajaram on Mon, 01 September 2008 06:37
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: rleishman on Mon, 01 September 2008 08:00
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: bmikle on Mon, 01 September 2008 08:16
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: rleishman on Mon, 01 September 2008 16:24
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 29 August 2008 05:46
		Re: Query optimisation using meaningless condition By: alammas on Fri, 29 August 2008 06:38

		unstable sort is inapprehensible (merged) By: stronghearted on Fri, 29 August 2008 04:36
		unstable sort is inapprehensible By: stronghearted on Fri, 29 August 2008 04:36
		Re: unstable sort is inapprehensible By: JRowbottom on Fri, 29 August 2008 09:19
		Re: unstable sort is inapprehensible By: stronghearted on Mon, 01 September 2008 00:34

		DB parameters By: pdhayan@qwest.com on Wed, 27 August 2008 10:55
		Re: DB parameters By: BlackSwan on Wed, 27 August 2008 11:11
		Re: DB parameters By: JRowbottom on Fri, 29 August 2008 09:41
		Re: DB parameters By: pdhayan@qwest.com on Fri, 29 August 2008 09:51

		help in tuning query By: trupti111 on Fri, 29 August 2008 02:09
		Re: help in tuning query By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 29 August 2008 05:54

		histogram By: ArvindBhope on Thu, 28 August 2008 14:11
		Re: histogram By: BlackSwan on Thu, 28 August 2008 14:14
		Re: histogram By: Mahesh Rajendran on Thu, 28 August 2008 14:30
		Re: histogram By: ArvindBhope on Thu, 28 August 2008 14:37
		Re: histogram By: Mahesh Rajendran on Thu, 28 August 2008 14:41

		Definition of wait event By: lunaut on Wed, 27 August 2008 13:13
		Re: Definition of wait event By: BlackSwan on Wed, 27 August 2008 13:18
		Re: Definition of wait event By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 27 August 2008 13:46
		Re: Definition of wait event By: lunaut on Thu, 28 August 2008 13:06
		Re: Definition of wait event By: BlackSwan on Thu, 28 August 2008 13:09
		Re: Definition of wait event By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 28 August 2008 13:16

		memory in statspack By: blakshmi on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:49
		Re: memory in statspack By: blakshmi on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:52
		Re: memory in statspack By: BlackSwan on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:54

		AWR Service Stats By: lunaut on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:49
		Re: AWR Service Stats By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 28 August 2008 12:54

		10g Database Performance By: Asma123 on Thu, 28 August 2008 08:37
		Re: 10g Database Performance By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 28 August 2008 10:47

		response time By: ArvindBhope on Wed, 27 August 2008 16:38
		Re: response time By: BlackSwan on Wed, 27 August 2008 16:42
		Re: response time By: rleishman on Wed, 27 August 2008 21:12
		Re: response time By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 28 August 2008 01:24

Pages (119): [ « ‹ 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 › »]

Goto Forum:

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Legend

New Messages

No New messages

Locked (w/ unread messages) Locked

Locked

Moved to another forum

Current Time: Fri Jul 05 13:10:08 CDT 2024