Please read the OraFAQ Forum Guide before posting.
Please contribute good answers to the wiki.
  Optimizing the query
By: user71408 on Mon, 23 March 2009 07:43
  Re: Optimizing the query
By: babuknb on Mon, 23 March 2009 07:46
  Re: Optimizing the query
By: ThomasG on Mon, 23 March 2009 07:46
  Re: Optimizing the query
By: user71408 on Mon, 23 March 2009 07:51
  Re: Optimizing the query
By: ThomasG on Mon, 23 March 2009 07:55
  Re: Optimizing the query
By: ora_baby on Mon, 23 March 2009 07:55
  Re: Optimizing the query
By: JRowbottom on Tue, 24 March 2009 07:17
  Re: Optimizing the query
By: JRowbottom on Tue, 24 March 2009 07:31
  optimisation of queries
By: rajasekhar857 on Tue, 24 March 2009 05:40
  Re: optimisation of queries
By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 24 March 2009 05:54
  Re: optimisation of queries
By: rajasekhar857 on Tue, 24 March 2009 06:17
  Re: optimisation of queries
By: cookiemonster on Tue, 24 March 2009 06:25
  rownum slowing query
By: psk1 on Wed, 18 March 2009 12:58
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: rleishman on Wed, 18 March 2009 22:54
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: psk1 on Thu, 19 March 2009 10:02
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 19 March 2009 10:11
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: Alessandro Rossi on Thu, 19 March 2009 10:38
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: psk1 on Thu, 19 March 2009 11:22
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: Alessandro Rossi on Thu, 19 March 2009 12:03
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: psk1 on Thu, 19 March 2009 12:16
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: Alessandro Rossi on Fri, 20 March 2009 05:46
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: psk1 on Fri, 20 March 2009 12:02
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: psk1 on Fri, 20 March 2009 13:41
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: rleishman on Fri, 20 March 2009 16:22
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: psk1 on Fri, 20 March 2009 16:46
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: psk1 on Fri, 20 March 2009 16:51
  Re: rownum slowing query
By: Alessandro Rossi on Mon, 23 March 2009 05:50
  query problem (merged 4)
By: shoowaruno on Fri, 20 March 2009 02:13
  Re: Table with million rows, query problem
By: Frank on Fri, 20 March 2009 02:42
  Re: Table with million rows, query problem
By: shoowaruno on Sun, 22 March 2009 04:27
  Re: query problem (merged 4)
By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 20 March 2009 03:08
  Re: query problem (merged 4)
By: BlackSwan on Sun, 22 March 2009 09:48
  No difference in plan and cost for IN and EXISTS
By: mbmalasenthil on Thu, 19 March 2009 23:27
  Re: No difference in plan and cost for IN and EXISTS
By: BlackSwan on Thu, 19 March 2009 23:34
  Re: No difference in plan and cost for IN and EXISTS
By: mbmalasenthil on Thu, 19 March 2009 23:37
  Re: No difference in plan and cost for IN and EXISTS
By: BlackSwan on Thu, 19 March 2009 23:46
  Re: No difference in plan and cost for IN and EXISTS
By: mbmalasenthil on Thu, 19 March 2009 23:51
  Re: No difference in plan and cost for IN and EXISTS
By: rleishman on Fri, 20 March 2009 16:32
  Re: No difference in plan and cost for IN and EXISTS
By: Michel Cadot on Sat, 21 March 2009 01:19
  Slowness Problem when logging in by tool Oracle sql developer
By: MIFI on Fri, 13 February 2009 08:10
  Re: Slowness Problem when logging in by tool Oracle sql developer
By: oraxperts on Thu, 19 March 2009 19:53
  show parameter session (merged)
By: dirish on Wed, 11 March 2009 04:36
  Re: show parameter session (merged)
By: alexzeng on Wed, 11 March 2009 10:10
  Re: show parameter session (merged)
By: dirish on Thu, 12 March 2009 01:19
  Re: show parameter session (merged)
By: alexzeng on Sat, 14 March 2009 09:35
  Re: show parameter session (merged)
By: dirish on Thu, 19 March 2009 04:30
  Re: show parameter session (merged)
By: alexzeng on Thu, 19 March 2009 09:34
  Re: show parameter session (merged)
By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 19 March 2009 09:48
  Re: show parameter session (merged)
By: oraxperts on Thu, 19 March 2009 19:50
  which index is faster
By: grpatwari on Wed, 11 March 2009 23:25
  Re: which index is faster
By: BlackSwan on Wed, 11 March 2009 23:31
  Re: which index is faster
By: rleishman on Thu, 12 March 2009 01:12
  Re: which index is faster
By: grpatwari on Thu, 12 March 2009 03:12
  Re: which index is faster
By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 12 March 2009 04:42
  Re: which index is faster
By: cookiemonster on Thu, 12 March 2009 04:20
  Re: which index is faster
By: michael_bialik on Sun, 15 March 2009 03:55
  Re: which index is faster
By: jayanta.senapati on Thu, 19 March 2009 05:29
  Is there any way to rebuilds indexes online in Oracle SE !!
By: AlinaC on Wed, 18 March 2009 15:51
  Re: Is there any way to rebuilds indexes online in Oracle SE !!
By: BlackSwan on Wed, 18 March 2009 18:43
  Query perfomance
By: gkrishn on Wed, 18 March 2009 10:30
  Re: Query perfomance
By: Mahesh Rajendran on Wed, 18 March 2009 10:42
  Re: Query perfomance
By: gkrishn on Wed, 18 March 2009 10:46
  Re: Query perfomance
By: Mahesh Rajendran on Wed, 18 March 2009 10:52
  Re: Query perfomance
By: gkrishn on Wed, 18 March 2009 11:09
  Re: Query perfomance
By: Mahesh Rajendran on Wed, 18 March 2009 11:15
  How to release the un-used INDEX space, which were created by DELETE
By: tapaskmanna on Wed, 11 March 2009 09:28
  Re: How to release the un-used INDEX space, which were created by DELETE
By: Mahesh Rajendran on Wed, 11 March 2009 09:33
  Re: How to release the un-used INDEX space, which were created by DELETE
By: alexzeng on Wed, 11 March 2009 09:37
  Re: How to release the un-used INDEX space, which were created by DELETE
By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 11 March 2009 10:01
  Re: How to release the un-used INDEX space, which were created by DELETE
By: tapaskmanna on Fri, 13 March 2009 05:47
  Re: How to release the un-used INDEX space, which were created by DELETE
By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 13 March 2009 07:20
  Re: How to release the un-used INDEX space, which were created by DELETE
By: alexzeng on Sat, 14 March 2009 09:18
  Re: How to release the un-used INDEX space, which were created by DELETE
By: Michel Cadot on Sat, 14 March 2009 10:04
  Re: How to release the un-used INDEX space, which were created by DELETE
By: Mahesh Rajendran on Sat, 14 March 2009 19:36
  TNS-12518: TNS:listener could not hand off client connection
By: oraclevijay on Thu, 12 March 2009 08:17
  Re: TNS-12518: TNS:listener could not hand off client connection
By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 12 March 2009 10:23
  Re: TNS-12518: TNS:listener could not hand off client connection
By: alexzeng on Sat, 14 March 2009 09:20
  Issue of Space as Data is growing Rapidly.
By: tapaskmanna on Wed, 11 March 2009 23:45
  Re: Issue of Space as Data is growing Rapidly.
By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 12 March 2009 00:09
  Re: Issue of Space as Data is growing Rapidly.
By: Mahesh Rajendran on Thu, 12 March 2009 04:30
  Re: Issue of Space as Data is growing Rapidly.
By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 12 March 2009 04:41
  BITMAP CONVERSION FROM/TO ROWIDS
By: mbmalasenthil on Wed, 11 March 2009 05:17
  Re: BITMAP CONVERSION FROM/TO ROWIDS
By: Mahesh Rajendran on Wed, 11 March 2009 07:31
  Re: BITMAP CONVERSION FROM/TO ROWIDS
By: rleishman on Wed, 11 March 2009 21:05
  Effective SQL
By: stvel on Tue, 10 March 2009 07:24
  Re: Effective SQL
By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 10 March 2009 07:40
  Oracle Performance Tuning of a view
By: manoj12 on Fri, 06 March 2009 06:04
  Re: Oracle Performance Tuning of a view
By: JRowbottom on Fri, 06 March 2009 08:20
  Re: Oracle Performance Tuning of a view
By: alexzeng on Sat, 07 March 2009 09:11
  Re: Oracle Performance Tuning of a view
By: Michel Cadot on Sat, 07 March 2009 09:25
  Re: Oracle Performance Tuning of a view
By: BlackSwan on Sat, 07 March 2009 09:31
  Changes to the query
By: mbmalasenthil on Fri, 06 March 2009 03:20
  Re: Changes to the query
By: rleishman on Fri, 06 March 2009 16:11
  Re: Changes to the query
By: Kevin Meade on Fri, 06 March 2009 23:53
  Re: Changes to the query
By: alexzeng on Sat, 07 March 2009 09:03
  PLSQL Query Tuning Suggestion/Feedback needed
By: bahubcd on Fri, 06 March 2009 05:28
  Re: PLSQL Query Tuning Suggestion/Feedback needed
By: rleishman on Fri, 06 March 2009 15:55
  Re: PLSQL Query Tuning Suggestion/Feedback needed
By: Kevin Meade on Sat, 07 March 2009 00:02
  Re: PLSQL Query Tuning Suggestion/Feedback needed
By: rleishman on Sat, 07 March 2009 05:52
  Re: PLSQL Query Tuning Suggestion/Feedback needed
By: alexzeng on Sat, 07 March 2009 08:59
  IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: sky_lt on Tue, 17 February 2009 12:26
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: BlackSwan on Tue, 17 February 2009 12:40
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: sky_lt on Tue, 17 February 2009 12:54
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: BlackSwan on Tue, 17 February 2009 13:04
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: pablolee on Tue, 17 February 2009 16:51
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: rleishman on Tue, 17 February 2009 22:06
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: rleishman on Mon, 23 February 2009 19:12
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: sky_lt on Fri, 27 February 2009 17:06
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: rleishman on Sun, 01 March 2009 00:23
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: sky_lt on Mon, 02 March 2009 13:09
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: Alessandro Rossi on Wed, 18 February 2009 03:36
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: sky_lt on Wed, 18 February 2009 06:24
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: alexzeng on Tue, 03 March 2009 00:50
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: sky_lt on Tue, 03 March 2009 01:13
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: cookiemonster on Tue, 03 March 2009 03:47
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: sky_lt on Tue, 03 March 2009 07:26
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: cookiemonster on Tue, 03 March 2009 08:40
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: rleishman on Tue, 03 March 2009 20:11
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: alexzeng on Fri, 06 March 2009 01:56
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: sky_lt on Fri, 06 March 2009 05:19
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: cookiemonster on Wed, 04 March 2009 03:43
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: sky_lt on Thu, 05 March 2009 02:28
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: Alessandro Rossi on Thu, 05 March 2009 02:44
  Re: IOT secondary indexes SLOW performance
By: cookiemonster on Fri, 06 March 2009 03:54
  Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: scottwmackey on Mon, 02 March 2009 18:25
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: alexzeng on Tue, 03 March 2009 00:38
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: JRowbottom on Tue, 03 March 2009 04:36
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: scottwmackey on Tue, 03 March 2009 11:05
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: coleing on Tue, 03 March 2009 16:45
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: rleishman on Tue, 03 March 2009 20:04
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: scottwmackey on Wed, 04 March 2009 13:41
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: gintsp on Wed, 04 March 2009 15:01
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: rleishman on Wed, 04 March 2009 21:11
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: scottwmackey on Thu, 05 March 2009 16:59
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: rleishman on Thu, 05 March 2009 19:18
  Re: Hash Joins and Memory Requirements
By: alexzeng on Fri, 06 March 2009 01:40
  updation of 200millions rows
By: junaidsystems on Fri, 27 February 2009 00:18
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: BlackSwan on Fri, 27 February 2009 00:24
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 27 February 2009 00:28
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: ajitpal.s on Fri, 27 February 2009 01:34
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: rsoma on Fri, 27 February 2009 01:49
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 27 February 2009 02:14
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: JRowbottom on Fri, 27 February 2009 02:55
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: junaidsystems on Fri, 27 February 2009 04:00
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: JRowbottom on Fri, 27 February 2009 06:10
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: junaidsystems on Fri, 27 February 2009 06:37
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: cookiemonster on Fri, 27 February 2009 07:03
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: junaidsystems on Fri, 27 February 2009 07:16
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: JRowbottom on Fri, 27 February 2009 08:16
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: ahudspith on Tue, 03 March 2009 07:27
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: JRowbottom on Tue, 03 March 2009 09:10
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: ajitpal.s on Tue, 03 March 2009 20:51
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: JRowbottom on Wed, 04 March 2009 08:45
  Re: updation of 200millions rows
By: cookiemonster on Fri, 27 February 2009 08:07
  Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: mbmalasenthil on Sat, 28 February 2009 05:54
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: rleishman on Sat, 28 February 2009 23:09
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: mbmalasenthil on Sun, 01 March 2009 05:05
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: JRowbottom on Mon, 02 March 2009 09:43
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: mbmalasenthil on Tue, 03 March 2009 02:07
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: JRowbottom on Tue, 03 March 2009 04:14
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: cookiemonster on Sun, 01 March 2009 10:34
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: Alessandro Rossi on Tue, 03 March 2009 04:16
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: mbmalasenthil on Tue, 03 March 2009 07:36
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: JRowbottom on Tue, 03 March 2009 07:44
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: mbmalasenthil on Tue, 03 March 2009 07:47
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: JRowbottom on Tue, 03 March 2009 09:21
  Re: Difference between cost and %CPU?
By: Mahesh Rajendran on Tue, 03 March 2009 15:33
  Indexes (merged 3)
By: danyromimd on Tue, 03 March 2009 06:20
  Re: Indexes (merged 3)
By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 03 March 2009 07:17
  Re: Indexes (merged 3)
By: danyromimd on Tue, 03 March 2009 09:22
  Re: Indexes (merged 3)
By: JRowbottom on Tue, 03 March 2009 09:35
  Re: Indexes (merged 3)
By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 03 March 2009 10:03
  Re: Indexes (merged 3)
By: danyromimd on Tue, 03 March 2009 10:11
  Re: Indexes (merged 3)
By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 03 March 2009 10:28
  Re: Indexes (merged 3)
By: danyromimd on Tue, 03 March 2009 11:00
  Re: Indexes (merged 3)
By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 03 March 2009 11:51
  Package Tuning using Bulk Excpetion
By: sr_orcl on Mon, 02 March 2009 23:25
  Re: Package Tuning using Bulk Excpetion
By: BlackSwan on Mon, 02 March 2009 23:36
  Re: Package Tuning using Bulk Excpetion
By: JRowbottom on Tue, 03 March 2009 06:45
  Package Tuning (merged 4)
By: sr_orcl on Wed, 25 February 2009 03:35
  Re: Package Tunning
By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 25 February 2009 03:42
  Re: Package Tunning
By: JRowbottom on Wed, 25 February 2009 08:11
  Re: Package Tunning
By: cookiemonster on Thu, 26 February 2009 07:59
  Re: Package Tunning
By: JRowbottom on Thu, 26 February 2009 10:00
  Package Tuning
By: sr_orcl on Fri, 27 February 2009 06:31
  Re: Package Tuning
By: cookiemonster on Fri, 27 February 2009 07:02
  Package Tuning (merged)
By: sr_orcl on Mon, 02 March 2009 05:37
  Re: Package Tuning (merged)
By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 02 March 2009 05:45
  Re: Package Tuning (merged 4)
By: BlackSwan on Mon, 02 March 2009 08:50
  Oracle 9i sga advisory view
By: jrmtl on Sun, 01 March 2009 20:16
  Re: Oracle 9i sga advisory view
By: BlackSwan on Sun, 01 March 2009 20:22
  Re: Oracle 9i sga advisory view
By: Michel Cadot on Sun, 01 March 2009 23:19
  Re: Oracle 9i sga advisory view
By: jrmtl on Mon, 02 March 2009 07:43
  Re: Oracle 9i sga advisory view
By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 02 March 2009 07:49
  Re: Oracle 9i sga advisory view
By: JRowbottom on Mon, 02 March 2009 08:02
  Understanding Explain Plan
By: ehegagoka on Wed, 20 August 2008 15:53
  Re: Understanding Explain Plan
By: rleishman on Wed, 20 August 2008 21:58
  Re: Understanding Explain Plan
By: ehegagoka on Thu, 21 August 2008 07:23
  Re: Understanding Explain Plan
By: rleishman on Sun, 24 August 2008 21:55
  Re: Understanding Explain Plan
By: ehegagoka on Mon, 25 August 2008 07:46
  Re: Understanding Explain Plan
By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 20 August 2008 23:42
  Re: Understanding Explain Plan
By: oyaryn on Mon, 02 March 2009 03:07
  Tuning analytical function query
By: ajitpal.s on Thu, 26 February 2009 08:08
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: BlackSwan on Thu, 26 February 2009 08:52
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: ajitpal.s on Thu, 26 February 2009 09:08
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: BlackSwan on Thu, 26 February 2009 09:13
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: ajitpal.s on Thu, 26 February 2009 09:32
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: BlackSwan on Thu, 26 February 2009 09:37
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: ajitpal.s on Thu, 26 February 2009 09:44
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: JRowbottom on Thu, 26 February 2009 09:53
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: ajitpal.s on Thu, 26 February 2009 10:10
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: rleishman on Thu, 26 February 2009 14:13
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: ajitpal.s on Thu, 26 February 2009 17:11
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: Alessandro Rossi on Fri, 27 February 2009 06:11
  Re: Tuning analytical function query
By: ajitpal.s on Fri, 27 February 2009 06:28
icon7.gif better way to write or tune a query with joins
By: abs_amit on Tue, 24 February 2009 08:51
  Re: better way to write or tune a query with joins
By: BlackSwan on Tue, 24 February 2009 10:23
  Re: better way to write or tune a query with joins
By: JRowbottom on Wed, 25 February 2009 08:18
  Re: better way to write or tune a query with joins
By: rleishman on Thu, 26 February 2009 14:59
  unable to reduce the cost of the query
By: dhanamukesh on Wed, 25 February 2009 04:54
  Re: unable to reduce the cost of the query
By: babuknb on Wed, 25 February 2009 05:08
  Re: unable to reduce the cost of the query
By: dhanamukesh on Thu, 26 February 2009 00:34
  Re: unable to reduce the cost of the query
By: JRowbottom on Thu, 26 February 2009 04:12
  Re: unable to reduce the cost of the query
By: babuknb on Thu, 26 February 2009 07:26
icon1.gif Subpartitions number
By: wakula on Tue, 13 January 2009 09:48
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 13 January 2009 10:31
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: wakula on Tue, 13 January 2009 11:15
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 13 January 2009 11:33
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: wakula on Tue, 13 January 2009 14:36
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 14 January 2009 00:25
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: rleishman on Wed, 14 January 2009 01:31
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 14 January 2009 01:45
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: rleishman on Thu, 15 January 2009 14:46
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 16 January 2009 00:53
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: rleishman on Fri, 16 January 2009 02:21
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 16 January 2009 02:33
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: wakula on Wed, 14 January 2009 03:03
icon3.gif Re: Subpartitions number
By: wakula on Fri, 16 January 2009 04:00
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: rleishman on Mon, 19 January 2009 00:39
  Re: Subpartitions number
By: wakula on Thu, 26 February 2009 04:13
  cardinality in bitmap index
By: saurabhshukla on Wed, 25 February 2009 12:10
  Re: cardinality in bitmap index
By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 25 February 2009 12:21
  Re: cardinality in bitmap index
By: BlackSwan on Wed, 25 February 2009 12:34
  Re: cardinality in bitmap index
By: saurabhshukla on Thu, 26 February 2009 03:18
icon5.gif Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Proble...
By: ltnuke on Thu, 27 March 2008 11:04
  Re: Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Pr...
By: Barbara Boehmer on Thu, 27 March 2008 15:14
  Re: Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Pr...
By: Tafer on Thu, 27 March 2008 15:50
  Re: Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Pr...
By: Barbara Boehmer on Thu, 27 March 2008 16:19
  Re: Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Pr...
By: Tafer on Thu, 27 March 2008 16:45
  Re: Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Pr...
By: rleishman on Thu, 27 March 2008 21:17
  Re: Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Pr...
By: ltnuke on Tue, 01 April 2008 11:03
  Re: Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Pr...
By: surferal41 on Wed, 25 February 2009 20:54
  Re: Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Pr...
By: Barbara Boehmer on Wed, 25 February 2009 22:55
  Re: Joining Oracle Text results with multiple tables / Performance Pr...
By: BlackSwan on Wed, 25 February 2009 20:58
  blevel in bitmap index
By: saurabhshukla on Tue, 24 February 2009 11:21
  Re: blevel in bitmap index
By: babuknb on Wed, 25 February 2009 03:44
  Modifying a plan
By: Olivia on Tue, 24 February 2009 02:40
  Re: Modifying a plan
By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 24 February 2009 02:58
  Re: Modifying a plan
By: Olivia on Tue, 24 February 2009 03:05
  Re: Modifying a plan
By: Olivia on Tue, 24 February 2009 04:14
  SQL tuning (merged)
By: cherry on Sat, 21 February 2009 23:56
  Re: SQL tuning (merged)
By: BlackSwan on Sun, 22 February 2009 00:40
  Re: SQL tuning (merged)
By: michael_bialik on Sun, 22 February 2009 08:05
  Re: SQL tuning (merged)
By: cherry on Mon, 23 February 2009 01:03
  Re: SQL tuning (merged)
By: michael_bialik on Mon, 23 February 2009 07:09
  Re: SQL tuning (merged)
By: cherry on Mon, 23 February 2009 22:42
  Inconsistent performance in database
By: prashas_d on Thu, 19 February 2009 05:47
  Re: Inconsistent performance in database
By: cookiemonster on Thu, 19 February 2009 06:01
  Re: Inconsistent performance in database
By: ahudspith on Thu, 19 February 2009 07:13
  Re: Inconsistent performance in database
By: rleishman on Mon, 23 February 2009 19:22
  Re: Inconsistent performance in database
By: BlackSwan on Mon, 23 February 2009 19:31
  Re: Inconsistent performance in database
By: rleishman on Mon, 23 February 2009 19:43
  Re: Inconsistent performance in database
By: BlackSwan on Mon, 23 February 2009 22:25
  tuning
By: sr_orcl on Sun, 22 February 2009 22:30
  Re: tuning
By: BlackSwan on Sun, 22 February 2009 22:33
  Index usage
By: deepak samal on Fri, 20 February 2009 04:56
  Re: Index usage
By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 20 February 2009 06:27
  Re: Index usage
By: rleishman on Fri, 20 February 2009 21:19
  Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Tue, 17 February 2009 07:34
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: rleishman on Tue, 17 February 2009 22:13
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Tue, 17 February 2009 22:34
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: BlackSwan on Tue, 17 February 2009 22:37
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Tue, 17 February 2009 23:39
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: cookiemonster on Wed, 18 February 2009 03:44
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Wed, 18 February 2009 06:00
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: cookiemonster on Wed, 18 February 2009 06:18
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Wed, 18 February 2009 06:29
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: cookiemonster on Wed, 18 February 2009 07:58
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Wed, 18 February 2009 22:21
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: cookiemonster on Thu, 19 February 2009 02:27
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Thu, 19 February 2009 02:39
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: cookiemonster on Thu, 19 February 2009 03:55
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Thu, 19 February 2009 05:49
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: cookiemonster on Thu, 19 February 2009 06:00
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Thu, 19 February 2009 06:46
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: cookiemonster on Thu, 19 February 2009 07:11
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Thu, 19 February 2009 22:12
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: cookiemonster on Fri, 20 February 2009 01:27
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: Brayan on Fri, 20 February 2009 07:42
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: cookiemonster on Fri, 20 February 2009 15:40
  Re: Execution Plan (merged)
By: rleishman on Fri, 20 February 2009 21:13
Pages (119): [ «    41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56    »]  Return to the default flat view Create a new topic
Goto Forum:
  
 [ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]
Legend New Messages New Messages   No New messages No New messages   Locked (w/ unread messages) Locked (w/ unread messages)   Locked Locked   Moved to another forum Moved to another forum

Current Time: Mon Jul 08 17:12:28 CDT 2024