OraFAQ Forum: Performance Tuning

Home » RDBMS Server » Performance Tuning
Show: Today's Messages :: Unanswered Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Please read the OraFAQ Forum Guide before posting.

Please contribute good answers to the wiki.

		Only LOCAL bitmap indexes are permitted on partitioned tables By: Sreedhar Reddy on Fri, 04 February 2005 02:12
		Re: Only LOCAL bitmap indexes are permitted on partitioned tables By: Mahesh Rajendran on Fri, 04 February 2005 05:44
		Re: Only LOCAL bitmap indexes are permitted on partitioned tables By: Sreedhar Reddy on Fri, 04 February 2005 20:36
		Re: Only LOCAL bitmap indexes are permitted on partitioned tables By: ankitamehani on Tue, 26 April 2011 18:46

		AWR By: gxeon on Thu, 21 April 2011 00:19
		Re: AWR By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 21 April 2011 01:16
		Re: AWR By: John Watson on Thu, 21 April 2011 01:45
		Re: AWR By: gxeon on Thu, 21 April 2011 02:09
		Re: AWR By: John Watson on Thu, 21 April 2011 02:39
		Re: AWR By: LKBrwn_DBA on Thu, 21 April 2011 12:35
		Re: AWR By: hkchital on Sun, 24 April 2011 22:41

		Kill the process By: lg123 on Thu, 21 April 2011 16:29
		Re: Kill the process By: BlackSwan on Thu, 21 April 2011 16:58
		Re: Kill the process By: lg123 on Thu, 21 April 2011 17:05
		Re: Kill the process By: BlackSwan on Thu, 21 April 2011 17:46
		Re: Kill the process By: lg123 on Thu, 21 April 2011 18:00
		Re: Kill the process By: BlackSwan on Thu, 21 April 2011 18:04
		Re: Kill the process By: lg123 on Thu, 21 April 2011 18:11
		Re: Kill the process By: BlackSwan on Thu, 21 April 2011 18:17

		AUDIT ANALYZE TABLE on 9i database? By: Kevin Meade on Tue, 19 April 2011 15:24
		Re: AUDIT ANALYZE TABLE on 9i database? By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 19 April 2011 23:08
		Re: AUDIT ANALYZE TABLE on 9i database? By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 20 April 2011 06:08

		High CPU Utilization in RAC and Log file sequential Read Event By: pchandna1 on Wed, 13 April 2011 15:31
		Re: High CPU Utilization in RAC and Log file sequential Read Event By: John Watson on Thu, 14 April 2011 02:20
		Re: High CPU Utilization in RAC and Log file sequential Read Event By: pchandna1 on Mon, 18 April 2011 13:58

		Max and delete statment talking lot of time By: vickey_sagar1 on Fri, 15 April 2011 17:22
		Re: Max and delete statment talking lot of time By: BlackSwan on Fri, 15 April 2011 17:30
		Re: Max and delete statment talking lot of time By: Michel Cadot on Sat, 16 April 2011 01:10
		Re: Max and delete statment talking lot of time By: michael_bialik on Mon, 18 April 2011 03:51
		Re: Max and delete statment talking lot of time By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 18 April 2011 04:21

		Oracle : Client version < Database version. By: SAKOURA on Fri, 15 April 2011 04:21
		Re: Oracle : Client version < Database version. By: cookiemonster on Fri, 15 April 2011 04:42
		Re: Oracle : Client version < Database version. By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 15 April 2011 05:26
		Re: Oracle : Client version < Database version. By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 15 April 2011 05:31
		Re: Oracle : Client version < Database version. By: SAKOURA on Fri, 15 April 2011 06:46
		Re: Oracle : Client version < Database version. By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 15 April 2011 06:48
		Re: Oracle : Client version < Database version. By: SAKOURA on Fri, 15 April 2011 06:50

		Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: OraKaran on Thu, 07 April 2011 06:27
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 07 April 2011 07:06
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: OraKaran on Thu, 07 April 2011 07:52
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: OraKaran on Thu, 07 April 2011 09:15
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: BlackSwan on Thu, 07 April 2011 09:23
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: OraKaran on Thu, 07 April 2011 09:37
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: BlackSwan on Thu, 07 April 2011 09:42
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: OraKaran on Thu, 07 April 2011 09:47
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: cookiemonster on Thu, 07 April 2011 09:50
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: BlackSwan on Thu, 07 April 2011 09:55
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: OraKaran on Thu, 07 April 2011 10:16
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: OraKaran on Thu, 07 April 2011 11:10
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: BlackSwan on Thu, 07 April 2011 11:18
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: OraKaran on Fri, 08 April 2011 04:04
		Re: Query Hanging with Sequential Read or Latch free Waits By: S.Rajaram on Thu, 14 April 2011 09:09

		subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: dave987 on Wed, 30 March 2011 19:51
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: BlackSwan on Wed, 30 March 2011 20:07
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: dave987 on Wed, 30 March 2011 21:31
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: Barbara Boehmer on Wed, 30 March 2011 22:08
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: Barbara Boehmer on Wed, 30 March 2011 22:16
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: dave987 on Fri, 08 April 2011 18:43
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: BlackSwan on Fri, 08 April 2011 19:15
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: dave987 on Fri, 08 April 2011 19:19
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: BlackSwan on Fri, 08 April 2011 19:24
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: dave987 on Fri, 08 April 2011 22:04
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: BlackSwan on Fri, 08 April 2011 22:13
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: dave987 on Wed, 13 April 2011 12:05
		Re: subquery optimization (6 threads merged by bb) By: Barbara Boehmer on Wed, 13 April 2011 12:32

		Tuning Insert By: sunny17 on Tue, 12 April 2011 22:39
		Re: Tuning Insert By: BlackSwan on Tue, 12 April 2011 22:47
		Re: Tuning Insert By: sunny17 on Tue, 12 April 2011 23:24
		Re: Tuning Insert By: BlackSwan on Tue, 12 April 2011 23:32
		Re: Tuning Insert By: cookiemonster on Wed, 13 April 2011 02:35

		Shall I kill these process... By: ramoradba on Mon, 11 April 2011 14:47
		Re: Shall I kill these process... By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 11 April 2011 14:55
		Re: Shall I kill these process... By: ramoradba on Mon, 11 April 2011 15:01

		Hier - Query Perfomance (3 Merged) By: mnafehm on Mon, 04 April 2011 11:59
		Re: Hier - Query Perfomance By: BlackSwan on Mon, 04 April 2011 12:04
		Re: Hier - Query Perfomance By: mnafehm on Mon, 04 April 2011 12:46
		Re: Hier - Query Perfomance By: rleishman on Sat, 09 April 2011 21:04

		How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be used i... By: vini_au on Mon, 04 April 2011 10:08
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: Littlefoot on Tue, 05 April 2011 00:04
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: John Watson on Tue, 05 April 2011 02:02
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: vini_au on Wed, 06 April 2011 19:43
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: vini_au on Thu, 07 April 2011 10:12
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:31
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: rleishman on Wed, 06 April 2011 08:35
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: vini_au on Thu, 07 April 2011 11:50
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 07 April 2011 14:58
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: rleishman on Thu, 07 April 2011 17:58
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: vini_au on Fri, 08 April 2011 00:04
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: rleishman on Fri, 08 April 2011 00:20
		Re: How to index 15 columns when you cannot predict what columns will be us... By: vini_au on Thu, 07 April 2011 23:30

		Why Oracle don't use my predefined index? By: Tlg13team on Thu, 07 April 2011 01:07
		Re: Why Oracle don't use my predefined index? By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 07 April 2011 01:09
		Re: Why Oracle don't use my predefined index? By: Tlg13team on Thu, 07 April 2011 01:13
		Re: Why Oracle don't use my predefined index? By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 07 April 2011 01:21
		Re: Why Oracle don't use my predefined index? By: Tlg13team on Thu, 07 April 2011 02:30
		Re: Why Oracle don't use my predefined index? By: Roachcoach on Thu, 07 April 2011 02:43

		Execution plan question By: Buchas on Tue, 05 April 2011 08:49
		Re: Execution plan question By: BlackSwan on Tue, 05 April 2011 08:55
		Re: Execution plan question By: Buchas on Wed, 06 April 2011 01:16
		Re: Execution plan question By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 02:57
		Re: Execution plan question By: cookiemonster on Tue, 05 April 2011 08:55
		Re: Execution plan question By: Roachcoach on Tue, 05 April 2011 10:29
		Re: Execution plan question By: Buchas on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:13
		Re: Execution plan question By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:24
		Re: Execution plan question By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:39
		Re: Execution plan question By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:57
		Re: Execution plan question By: Buchas on Wed, 06 April 2011 05:44
		Re: Execution plan question By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 05:53
		Re: Execution plan question By: Buchas on Wed, 06 April 2011 06:18
		Re: Execution plan question By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 07:10
		Re: Execution plan question By: Buchas on Wed, 06 April 2011 08:08
		Re: Execution plan question By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 08:29

		Performance tuning of query with self join By: preethavinay on Wed, 06 April 2011 01:41
		Re: Performance tuning of query with self join By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:00
		Re: Performance tuning of query with self join By: michael_bialik on Wed, 06 April 2011 06:08

		how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: kang on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:33
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:34
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: kang on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:39
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:42
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: kang on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:51
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:57
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: Roachcoach on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:54
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 03:58
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: kang on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:10
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: kang on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:13
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:16
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: kang on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:16
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:17
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: kang on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:20
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: kang on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:25
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: Roachcoach on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:26
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: kang on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:32
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:42
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: Roachcoach on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:59
		Re: how to use index on "ON in MERGE statement"? By: cookiemonster on Wed, 06 April 2011 04:15

		Just clarification my mind about redo log file size By: Tlg13team on Wed, 06 April 2011 00:01
		Re: Just clarification my mind about redo log file size By: BlackSwan on Wed, 06 April 2011 00:08
		Re: Just clarification my mind about redo log file size By: Tlg13team on Wed, 06 April 2011 01:05
		Re: Just clarification my mind about redo log file size By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 06 April 2011 01:16

		please help me tune this query By: miroconnect@yahoo.com on Sun, 03 April 2011 08:42
		Re: please help me tune this query By: cookiemonster on Mon, 04 April 2011 02:12
		Re: please help me tune this query By: cookiemonster on Mon, 04 April 2011 04:20
		Re: please help me tune this query By: cookiemonster on Mon, 04 April 2011 09:10

		Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: ram anand on Wed, 30 March 2011 01:26
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 30 March 2011 01:31
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: ram anand on Wed, 30 March 2011 02:29
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 30 March 2011 03:13
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 30 March 2011 13:03
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: ram anand on Fri, 01 April 2011 03:24
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: ram anand on Fri, 01 April 2011 03:25
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: ram anand on Fri, 01 April 2011 03:28
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: Roachcoach on Fri, 01 April 2011 04:14
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: ram anand on Fri, 01 April 2011 04:35
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: ram anand on Fri, 01 April 2011 04:38
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: Roachcoach on Fri, 01 April 2011 04:41
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: ram anand on Fri, 01 April 2011 05:33
		Re: Query getting slowed running in Oracle 10g compared to Oracle 9i By: Roachcoach on Fri, 01 April 2011 05:43
		<more>

		Query not executing (3 Merged) By: ajaykumarkona on Mon, 28 March 2011 12:53
		Re: Query not executing By: BlackSwan on Mon, 28 March 2011 12:54
		Re: Query not executing By: ajaykumarkona on Mon, 28 March 2011 13:38
		Re: Query not executing By: ajaykumarkona on Mon, 28 March 2011 13:54
		Re: Query not executing By: BlackSwan on Mon, 28 March 2011 14:00
		Re: Query not executing By: ajaykumarkona on Tue, 29 March 2011 14:46
		Re: Query not executing By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 30 March 2011 13:08
		Re: Query not executing By: ajaykumarkona on Wed, 30 March 2011 13:41
		Re: Query not executing By: ajaykumarkona on Fri, 01 April 2011 12:34
		Re: Query not executing By: cookiemonster on Fri, 01 April 2011 15:15
		Re: Query not executing By: ajaykumarkona on Fri, 01 April 2011 15:43
		Re: Query not executing By: cookiemonster on Mon, 04 April 2011 02:26

		derived column index By: miroconnect@yahoo.com on Sat, 02 April 2011 02:14
		Re: derived column index By: Michel Cadot on Sat, 02 April 2011 02:56
		Re: derived column index By: miroconnect@yahoo.com on Sat, 02 April 2011 07:51
		Re: derived column index By: BlackSwan on Sat, 02 April 2011 08:37

		using between slows query By: miroconnect@yahoo.com on Sat, 02 April 2011 00:46
		Re: using between slows query By: Michel Cadot on Sat, 02 April 2011 01:24

		Performance tuning of query with self join By: preethavinay on Thu, 31 March 2011 07:08
		Re: Performance tuning of query with self join By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 31 March 2011 07:39
		Re: Performance tuning of query with self join By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 31 March 2011 07:40
		Re: Performance tuning of query with self join By: preethavinay on Thu, 31 March 2011 07:49
		Re: Performance tuning of query with self join By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 31 March 2011 08:15
		Re: Performance tuning of query with self join By: BlackSwan on Thu, 31 March 2011 08:37
		Re: Performance tuning of query with self join By: Its_me_ved on Fri, 01 April 2011 02:48

		split a large table to small pieces? By: Tlg13team on Mon, 28 March 2011 05:55
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 28 March 2011 06:07
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Tlg13team on Mon, 28 March 2011 06:21
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Tlg13team on Wed, 30 March 2011 06:55
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 30 March 2011 07:05
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Tlg13team on Wed, 30 March 2011 07:20
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 30 March 2011 07:28
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: John Watson on Wed, 30 March 2011 12:42
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 30 March 2011 12:57
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Tlg13team on Thu, 31 March 2011 01:34
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Tlg13team on Thu, 31 March 2011 01:42
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 31 March 2011 01:53
		Re: split a large table to small pieces? By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 31 March 2011 03:40

		Can I use Oracle Hint to use index in a query which uses UNION By: arijitdey80 on Thu, 31 March 2011 01:13
		Re: Can I use Oracle Hint to use index in a query which uses UNION By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 31 March 2011 01:52

		Why are these explain plans missing some info and messed up like they've be... By: ilharco on Tue, 29 March 2011 00:01
		Re: Why are these explain plans missing some info and messed up like they'v... By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 29 March 2011 01:06
		Re: Why are these explain plans missing some info and messed up like they'v... By: flyboy on Tue, 29 March 2011 02:12
		Re: Why are these explain plans missing some info and messed up like they'v... By: LKBrwn_DBA on Tue, 29 March 2011 08:26
		Re: Why are these explain plans missing some info and messed up like they'v... By: ilharco on Tue, 29 March 2011 12:47
		Re: Why are these explain plans missing some info and messed up like they'v... By: ilharco on Tue, 29 March 2011 13:16
		Re: Why are these explain plans missing some info and messed up like they'v... By: BlackSwan on Tue, 29 March 2011 13:18
		SELECT * from v$version output By: ilharco on Tue, 29 March 2011 13:27
		Re: SELECT * from v$version output By: BlackSwan on Tue, 29 March 2011 17:06

		nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: Kevin Meade on Tue, 08 September 2009 15:52
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: JRowbottom on Wed, 09 September 2009 07:12
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 09 September 2009 12:11
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: Kevin Meade on Wed, 09 September 2009 16:55
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: JRowbottom on Thu, 10 September 2009 05:32
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: Kevin Meade on Thu, 10 September 2009 11:19
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: ipynnonen on Tue, 29 March 2011 03:10
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: ipynnonen on Tue, 29 March 2011 04:00
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: ipynnonen on Tue, 29 March 2011 04:01
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: Kevin Meade on Tue, 29 March 2011 08:19
		Re: nested select / instead-of-trigger and views=no index used By: ipynnonen on Tue, 29 March 2011 08:47

		Performance issue with long running query By: prasadpsk on Wed, 23 March 2011 14:52
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: Michel Cadot on Wed, 23 March 2011 14:58
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: prasadpsk on Wed, 23 March 2011 15:03
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: LKBrwn_DBA on Thu, 24 March 2011 09:00
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: rleishman on Sat, 26 March 2011 06:46
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: ma_appsdba on Wed, 23 March 2011 16:31
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: ThomasG on Wed, 23 March 2011 17:25
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: Kevin Meade on Sun, 27 March 2011 11:36
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: rleishman on Sun, 27 March 2011 17:01
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: Kevin Meade on Mon, 28 March 2011 07:28
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: prasadpsk on Mon, 28 March 2011 12:43
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: Kevin Meade on Mon, 28 March 2011 13:07
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: prasadpsk on Mon, 28 March 2011 15:00
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: BlackSwan on Mon, 28 March 2011 15:06
		Re: Performance issue with long running query By: rleishman on Tue, 29 March 2011 03:16

		How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MERGED) By: Tlg13team on Fri, 25 March 2011 23:28
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table By: BlackSwan on Fri, 25 March 2011 23:30
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: Michel Cadot on Sat, 26 March 2011 02:45
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: flyboy on Sat, 26 March 2011 02:55
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: Kevin Meade on Sun, 27 March 2011 12:24
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: Michel Cadot on Sun, 27 March 2011 12:29
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: Kevin Meade on Sun, 27 March 2011 13:17
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: Tlg13team on Mon, 28 March 2011 04:27
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 28 March 2011 04:31
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: Tlg13team on Mon, 28 March 2011 20:34
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: Kevin Meade on Mon, 28 March 2011 20:50
		Re: How to assure partition table is better than non-partition table (2 MER... By: BlackSwan on Mon, 28 March 2011 21:19

		row cache lock/dc_users?? By: chris32680 on Thu, 17 March 2011 09:19
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 17 March 2011 09:37
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: BlackSwan on Thu, 17 March 2011 09:48
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: chris32680 on Thu, 17 March 2011 09:49
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 17 March 2011 10:00
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: chris32680 on Thu, 17 March 2011 10:04
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: chris32680 on Thu, 17 March 2011 10:01
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: BlackSwan on Thu, 17 March 2011 10:06
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: chris32680 on Thu, 17 March 2011 10:15
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: BlackSwan on Thu, 17 March 2011 10:19
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: Roachcoach on Thu, 17 March 2011 10:23
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 17 March 2011 11:14
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: chris32680 on Thu, 17 March 2011 13:09
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 17 March 2011 13:27
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: chris32680 on Thu, 17 March 2011 13:32
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 17 March 2011 13:53
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: chris32680 on Thu, 17 March 2011 13:58
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: BlackSwan on Thu, 17 March 2011 14:58
		Re: row cache lock/dc_users?? By: Michel Cadot on Thu, 17 March 2011 15:06
		<more>

		clarification of query EXPLAIN plan By: Tlg13team on Thu, 24 March 2011 21:11
		Re: clarification of query EXPLAIN plan By: BlackSwan on Thu, 24 March 2011 21:14
		Re: clarification of query EXPLAIN plan By: Tlg13team on Thu, 24 March 2011 22:15
		Re: clarification of query EXPLAIN plan By: BlackSwan on Thu, 24 March 2011 22:24
		Re: clarification of query EXPLAIN plan By: Kevin Meade on Sun, 27 March 2011 12:39
		Re: clarification of query EXPLAIN plan By: Tlg13team on Sun, 27 March 2011 20:15

		why db need kill session instantly By: runinwind on Tue, 22 March 2011 03:52
		Re: why db need kill session instantly By: wkk1020 on Tue, 22 March 2011 04:34
		Re: why db need kill session instantly By: vjeedigunta on Sat, 26 March 2011 00:58

		sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: karioookey on Fri, 18 March 2011 11:30
		Re: sql library miss rate By: BlackSwan on Fri, 18 March 2011 11:38
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 18 March 2011 12:04
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: John Watson on Fri, 18 March 2011 16:23
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: Michel Cadot on Fri, 18 March 2011 16:46
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: John Watson on Fri, 18 March 2011 16:51
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: Littlefoot on Sat, 19 March 2011 01:52
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: Michel Cadot on Sat, 19 March 2011 02:04
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: Littlefoot on Sat, 19 March 2011 08:43
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: odbtools on Mon, 21 March 2011 10:41
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 21 March 2011 11:21
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: odbtools on Mon, 21 March 2011 13:03
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 21 March 2011 13:10
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: odbtools on Mon, 21 March 2011 13:42
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: Michel Cadot on Mon, 21 March 2011 13:56
		Re: sql library miss rate (2 Merged) By: Michel Cadot on Tue, 22 March 2011 14:29

		SQL Tuning ... By: aucrun on Tue, 22 March 2011 12:54
		Re: SQL Tuning ... By: BlackSwan on Tue, 22 March 2011 13:02

		9582.69043 gigabytes of physical read total bytes and increasing! By: nabeelkhan on Thu, 17 March 2011 22:49
		Re: 9582.69043 gigabytes of physical read total bytes and increasing! By: nabeelkhan on Thu, 17 March 2011 22:57
		Re: 9582.69043 gigabytes of physical read total bytes and increasing! By: BlackSwan on Thu, 17 March 2011 23:09
		Re: 9582.69043 gigabytes of physical read total bytes and increasing! By: nabeelkhan on Thu, 17 March 2011 23:25
		Re: 9582.69043 gigabytes of physical read total bytes and increasing! By: flyboy on Thu, 17 March 2011 23:31
		Re: 9582.69043 gigabytes of physical read total bytes and increasing! By: nabeelkhan on Thu, 17 March 2011 23:39
		Re: 9582.69043 gigabytes of physical read total bytes and increasing! By: Roachcoach on Fri, 18 March 2011 03:19
		Re: 9582.69043 gigabytes of physical read total bytes and increasing! By: nabeelkhan on Sat, 19 March 2011 00:47
		Re: 9582.69043 gigabytes of physical read total bytes and increasing! By: John Watson on Sat, 19 March 2011 03:12

INDEXES on TIMESTAMP

By: amcghie on Thu, 17 March 2011 12:01

		help me tune this By: xpact83 on Sun, 13 March 2011 18:46
		Re: help me tune this By: BlackSwan on Sun, 13 March 2011 19:04
		Re: help me tune this By: flyboy on Mon, 14 March 2011 00:52
		Re: help me tune this By: michael_bialik on Mon, 14 March 2011 04:55

		Update in a Loop By: feroze on Fri, 11 March 2011 10:49
		Re: Update in a Loop By: BlackSwan on Fri, 11 March 2011 10:57
		Re: Update in a Loop By: ThomasG on Fri, 11 March 2011 10:59
		Re: Update in a Loop By: feroze on Fri, 11 March 2011 11:04
		Re: Update in a Loop By: flyboy on Fri, 11 March 2011 12:08

		help me tune this By: newbie69 on Fri, 11 March 2011 00:58
		Re: help me tune this By: cookiemonster on Fri, 11 March 2011 04:07
		Re: help me tune this By: Roachcoach on Fri, 11 March 2011 04:30

Pages (119): [ « ‹ 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 › »]

Goto Forum:

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Legend

New Messages

No New messages

Locked (w/ unread messages) Locked

Locked

Moved to another forum

Current Time: Mon May 20 09:32:01 CDT 2024